"Then I heard the voice of the Lord saying, 'Whom shall I send? And who will go for us?' And I said, 'Here am I. Send me!'" - Isaiah 6:8
Sunday, February 28, 2010
The most adorable thing
Francis Collins sermon
Friday, February 26, 2010
In-house for kindergarteners?
Yes, he used the f-word. Yes, he started dancing through the room trying to make the other people laugh. Is it really worth it?
Of course, he would forget six minutes of time-out in four minutes. He's not going to forget three days in in-house in a hurry. However, it may be over the top... Right now I'm assuming that the people in charge know what they're doing. If this sort of thing happens again, with less provocation, I'm going to rethink that trust.
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Yet another song I love
"A woman without a man is like..."
Well, it happened. Oh joy.
- swears in class
- uses crude analogies
- expressed political twisting of the facts
- deals with increasingly adult content
and has made me more and more concerned about whether or not I would need to deal with the situation actively as opposed to passively.
So today, he got right off on a grammatical start, dealing with whom vs. who by giving the example of the Hamilton - Burr duel in early American history. Not particularly bad, no big deal, except that he then went on to lay vs. lie.
"You do not get 'laid.' You get 'lain.' I don't care how any of you do it, same sex, opposite sex, animals, corpses, but you do not get laid! You get lain." Good grief. This is a man with children at home.
I was just going to deal with it, not bother talking to him about it, but then he started...comparing God Almighty to the Greek "deities." You see, we were talking about Sophocles's "Antigone," and he started talking about the concept that people were the playthings of the gods, and he compared the play to the Torah (or Hebrew Bible) which he said had been coming out at the same time as this play. He talked about the suffering of the Greek mythical woman Niobe. Because of her pride, the gods killed her innocent children, then turned her into stone which continued weeping forever.
My professor then went on to compare Niobe to Job, asking whether anyone was familiar with the story of Job. I raised my hand, and was granted the "honor" of telling the story. He cut me off after the beginning, the permission granted to Satan to torment Job. He said, "Look, they are playing with a man's life on behalf of a wager." He then went on to complain that Job's children were innocent, and brought up the classic problem of suffering in the case, namely "How can Job (who has been established as a good man) suffer with the permission of a just and all-powerful God?"
I pointed out that at the end Job got everything back and more, but it didn't especially seem to bother him. I figured, enough is enough and I'm not going to take this garbage all semester. Let me tell him where I stand. So after class, I went up to him. "Great points on Job earlier, by the way." he commented. "Yeah, actually, I wanted to talk to you about that." "Please, go ahead." he invited.
I politely told him that I had been offended by his way of addressing that, and that it had sounded like he had started from the assumption that the Bible was false. He responded by apologizing and saying he didn't see how that was what it had sounded like. I then went on to point out that when I signed up for the class, I didn't know that it would contain this level of adult content. He told me, "I'm sorry that you were offended, but I'm interested in results, and experience has shown me that there will be fewer of those grammatical mistakes on tests and papers when I make these analogies." I nodded, thanked him and left.
So now the question is whether it will happen again.
Saturday, February 20, 2010
HAHA guess where I am
Also, this is my fortieth post! YAY!
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Yes, people care.
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
People, do your research!
So the thing is, what if someone went and threw these questions at someone who didn't know the answers? I've got a fairly minor grounding in certain apologetics, but I think that a good background in apologetics is important to have so that when a person like my friend Keller comes and asks you about a seeming contradiction, you don't leave him or her with the impression that they've hit upon a problem that's unanswerable.
(Oh, and if you're an atheist reading this, ask the questions that bother you instead of just assuming that we're stupid. There's been a lot of research and reasoning put into justifying Christianity.)
Sunday, February 14, 2010
If it's the beginning of the second semester...
By the time I graduate, I bet almost the whole campus will know me as a driven, almost single-minded religious enthusiast.
(Yes, that's a good thing.)
Friday, February 12, 2010
Another piece from Casting Crowns
Friday night
Thursday, February 11, 2010
First speech
Finally, it was my turn to go. I walked up and delivered my speech while ignoring the fact that my hands were as awkward as sausages and I kept needing to look at my notes. It really wasn't as bad as the waiting had been. Go figure. So that hurdle is over with, so...onto the next one.
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
I love this article...
Ibn Ishaq Al Kindy1 says: “Allah, may he be blessed and exalted, is absolutely one, and does not allow any multiplicity or composition. He is beyond description, and can not be described by any category. (The magazine of the University of Umm-Al-Qura, Vol. 6, p. 123)
----
1. The Qur’an says about Allah “nothing is like him”.
2. This means that Allah is other than anything that comes to your mind about him.
3. Muslims believe in the doctrine of "Mukhalaft مخالفة" ‘unlikeness’, which means there is no likeness whatsoever between Allah, and his characteristics, on one hand and all that pertains to creatures on the other.
4. The Qur’an is Allah’s word which is not like human words. (Arabic source for the fourth point.)
The above demonstrates that it is impossible to use human language to talk about Allah. That means if the Qur’an is credible in what it tells about Allah’s nature and characteristics, then it cannot be a revelation from that Allah. In other words, if it is false, it is false; if it is true, it is also false; therefore, it is false.
This teaching of the Qur'an leads to the impossibility of using human language to define Allah.
Therefore, since the Qur’an is written with human language, it can not be an expression of Allah, it cannot be a revelation from him, nor can it be his word.
That is to say if the Qur’an is true about who Allah is, it cannot be true about what the Qur’an is, and vice versa.
The only way, for Muslims to solve this dilemma is by considering that all words of the Qur’an are other than facts and that they are not equivalent to any human concept even if the wordings of both agree. Expressed differently, those words actually mean nothing, they are in fact only empty words.
Thus, the Muslims’ teaching that Allah is other than what comes to our minds logically means that if we have understood what the Qur’an said about Allah, He is other than what the Qur’an has said about him.
If you like this, go to http://www.answering-islam.org/ for more.
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
You're going to offend someone...
How many people are like this?
Lamest election ever
Monday, February 8, 2010
Seriously, people...
Sunday, February 7, 2010
The Monk Joke
On the boy's last night there, the monk came in and told him, "You'll hear a ticking noise during the night. Don't ask me what it is, because I can only tell monks." During the night the boy did indeed hear a ticking noise. The next morning, forgetting the monk's directive the previous night, asked, "What was that mysterious ticking noise?" The monk answered, "I can't tell you. I can only tell monks." And he sent the boy home to his mother.
Fifteen years later, the young man received his first car. His mother told him, "Don't go too far. and remember to wear your seat belt." Again the man thought, The heck with you Mom, and went far beyond the city limits. He hit the same tree, and the same monk came and took him back to the same monastery and nursed him back to health. Neither of them remembered the other.
On the man's last night there, the monk came in and said, "You'll hear a ticking noise during the night. Don't ask me what it is, because I can only tell monks."
Then the man remembered, and was overwhelmed with curiosity.
He went away the next day, and joined another monastery, and after his official monk certification he returned to the first monastery. He asked if he could spend the night and was of course granted permission. The next morning he went to the monk and said, "Brother Monk, what was that mysterious ticking noise?"
The monk said, "Go to the orchard and dig under the tree in the southeast corner."
The man did so and found a box with an orange key. He went back to the monk and said, "Where does this key go?" The monk took him to the third guest bedroom on the second floor, moved aside the wardrobe and there was an orange door. The key opened the door, and there was a purple door behind it. The monk told the man, "Go to the fifth berry bush from the left in the middle row in the raspberry field." So the man did so, and there was a blue key. Upon discovering that the blue key did not open the purple door, the man was told that there was a blue cabinet under the bed. After looking, he found the box and opened it, and there was the purple key. Behind the purple door was a flight of stairs.
The man climbed and climbed and climbed and climbed and climbed and climbed and climbed and climbed and climbed and climbed and climbed and climbed and climbed and climbed and climbed and climbed and climbed, up and up and up and up and up.
At the top, the exhausted man found a red door.
He slid down the banister and gasped, clutching the stitch in his side, "Brother...Monk...there's a...red...door up there.... The monk gave him a red key and bade him climb again. The man almost died of heart failure on the way up the stairs, but he finally reached the top, unlocked the door and entered a dark room. The mysterious ticking noise was verrrryyyy close...
What was it?
--------------------------------------
I can't tell you. I can only tell monks.
The Importance of Prayer
-"Isn't it irrelevant because anything that will happen was already going to?"
Who says it didn't happen because you prayed for it?
or
-"How do I know that God hears me?"
Sometimes you don't. It's an issue of faith, to trust Him anyway.
I don't think that praying is like any of the above forms of communication. It's unique. Furthermore, prayer is important because your relationship with God is, well, a relationship. How do you build a relationship with someone you don't talk to? (Yes, for the sake of argument I am including IMing on sites and Facebook, texting and other forms of direct two-sided communication as "talking.")
So, have you talked to God today?
Saturday, February 6, 2010
Just to say...
So I'm happy about this.
Thursday, February 4, 2010
I like this video...
My point isn't the cyclists, I just think this is cool. Not that you shouldn't be careful...
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Scary numbers...
Since my planned career path is missions in the 10-40 window, I did some research today.
-Iran - Muslim 98% (Shia 89%, Sunni 9%), other (includes Zoroastrian, Jewish, Christian, and Baha'i) 2%
-Iraq - Muslim 97% (Shia 60%-65%, Sunni 32%-37%), Christian or other 3%
-Yemen - Muslim including Shaf'i (Sunni) and Zaydi (Shia), small numbers of Jewish, Christian, and Hindu
-Saudi Arabia - Muslim 100%
-Pakistan - Muslim 95% (Sunni 75%, Shia 20%), other (includes Christian and Hindu) 5%
-Kazakhstan - Muslim 47%, Russian Orthodox 44%, Protestant 2%, other 7%
-Afghanistan - Sunni Muslim 80%, Shia Muslim 19%, other 1%
-Egypt - Muslim (mostly Sunni) 90%, Coptic 9%, other Christian 1%
-Syria - Sunni Muslim 74%, other Muslim (includes Alawite, Druze) 16%, Christian (various denominations) 10%, Jewish (tiny communities in Damascus, Al Qamishli, and Aleppo)
-Oman - Ibadhi Muslim 75%, other (includes Sunni Muslim, Shia Muslim, Hindu) 25%
-Lebanon - Muslim 59.7% (Shia, Sunni, Druze, Isma'ilite, Alawite or Nusayri), Christian 39% (Maronite Catholic, Greek Orthodox, Melkite Catholic, Armenian Orthodox, Syrian Catholic, Armenian Catholic, Syrian Orthodox, Roman Catholic, Chaldean, Assyrian, Copt, Protestant), other 1.3% note: 17 religious sects recognized
-Israel - Jewish 76.4%, Muslim 16%, Arab Christians 1.7%, other Christian 0.4%, Druze 1.6%, unspecified 3.9% (2004)
-Turkmenistan - Muslim 89%, Eastern Orthodox 9%, unknown 2%
-Uzbekistan - Muslim 88% (mostly Sunnis), Eastern Orthodox 9%, other 3%
-Kyrgyzstan - Muslim 75%, Russian Orthodox 20%, other 5%
All information was copied and pasted directly from CIA - The World Factbook.
I think I have more than every right to be concerned.